Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 90% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211230
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '22 at 19:14
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12400-$209 51 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 85.8 1-Core 167 2-Core 324 106% 192 Pts	4-Core 626 8-Core 1,004 104% 815 Pts	64-Core 1,204 81% 1,204 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$390 520,358 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.7% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 109 Parallax 110 92% 111 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 97 Splatting 88.8 82% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SKC2500M8500G 500GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: S7780100 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 2,799 Write 2200 Mixed 1,686 494% 2,228 MB/s	4K Read 62.7 4K Write 276 4K Mixed 102 373% 147 MB/s	DQ Read 1,325 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 352 431% 778 MB/s
Poor: 219% Great: 309%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$26 473,047 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 209GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 110 110 110 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	63% Good	Read 111 Write 111 Mixed 65 SusWrite 109 72% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 71%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$26 473,047 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 356GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 106 106 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 108 Write 104 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 105 71% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 201,094 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 42.5 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 37 114% 40 GB/s	SC Read 25.2 SC Write 43 SC Mixed 30.2 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	144	27"	1280 720	GSM5B71 27GL650F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-E D4 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-E D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $184Bench 98%, 91 samples	2x
Core i5-12400Intel $209Bench 97%, 51 samples	2x
Core i5-12500Intel $220Bench 96%, 18 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $390Bench 89%, 520,358 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 886,468 samples	1x
GTX 1660Nvidia $230Bench 69%, 197,047 samples	1x

SSD
SX6000LNP 512GBAdataBench 180%, 10,300 samples	1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $65Bench 288%, 366,438 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 201,094 samples	2x
BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GBCrucialBench 101%, 8,067 samples	1x
2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 21,638 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $574

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $295	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $184	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $245	Nvidia RTX 3080 $700	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16