HP Compaq dc5700 Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc5700 Small Form Factor  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A60h
Memory4.3 GB free of 7.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '22 at 12:39
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium D 2.80GHz
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 20.6
2-Core 33.7
28% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 37.2
8-Core 35.8
5% 36.5 Pts
64-Core 41.5
3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160215SCE 160GB-$20
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ACF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Read 5
Write 22.3
Mixed 5
SusWrite 1.8
6% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 42%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
22GB free
Firmware: 10.01E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 0.8 0.8 1 0.7 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.62% Terrible
Read 27.8
Write 20.6
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 5.3
13% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.62%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback