Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400H 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 245 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 674 72% 573 Pts	64-Core 668 41% 668 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0831) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 38.1 Parallax 8.1 6% 17.6 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X2 50 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 301 309 305 307 305 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.4% Good	Read 389 Write 373 Mixed 298 SusWrite 305 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 23.8 86% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 130 103% 143 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB 6,839 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	MC Read 33 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 28.1 92% 32.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 38.4 SC Mixed 27.2 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 62 65% 62 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	943x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	389x
Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples	226x

SSD
NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 196%, 7,642 samples	109x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	106x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	99x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	163x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	108x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 81%, 3,590 samples	75x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16