Powerspec PowerSpec

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Powerspec PowerSpec (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock H110M-HDV
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '22 at 01:25
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$202 221,872 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 125 64% 101 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 358 49% 360 Pts	64-Core 352 24% 352 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155 870,997 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Zotac(19DA 1454) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 35.3 Reflection 39.5 Parallax 40.9 28% 38.6 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 26.2 30% 33.4 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 35%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$20 739,489 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 70 87 90 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 85.8 Write 59.5 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 92 48% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GKE400UD51208-2400AH 2x4GB 579 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.9% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 19.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 45: 4R 6G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	41%	41	254	179	100	27"	1920 1080	AUS2720 VG278

History: Score 27: 4R 0G 7B | Score 45: 4R 6G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PowerSpec Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

System: Powerspec PowerSpec

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $300Bench 83%, 588,541 samples	289x
Core i7-7700KIntel $365Bench 86%, 565,683 samples	178x
Core i5-6500Intel $202Bench 72%, 221,872 samples	56x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $138Bench 80%, 1,234,782 samples	167x
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 51%, 832,260 samples	89x
GTX 1080Nvidia $500Bench 105%, 915,325 samples	80x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $170Bench 96%, 75,944 samples	88x
Z400s 256GBSanDisk $144Bench 72%, 11,098 samples	52x
M600 SATA M.2 512GBMicronBench 102%, 1,022 samples	41x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $64Bench 85%, 269,535 samples	187x
F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 88%, 612 samples	90x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $58Bench 82%, 164,868 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $672

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350	Nvidia RTX 3050 $250	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16