Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M52BC_M32BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 19:10
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8310
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 91.4
48% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 304
30% 245 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 85F1) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 10.4
6% 8.9 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 8
Splatting 6.3
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1203AB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 87 53 52 51 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 420
Write 46.1
Mixed 277
SusWrite 76
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 24.4
70% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 62.7
DQ Mixed 65.8
63% 102 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
754GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 106 106 104 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 104
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
711GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 121 121 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 48.4
Write 126
Mixed 45
SusWrite 119
125% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.2
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 48%
SMI USB DISK 252GB
153GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 32 55 126 60 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 142
Write 124
Mixed 118
SusWrite 53
142% 109 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.4
227% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 5.8
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback