Emachines eM350

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEmachines eM350  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer eM350
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '22 at 02:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 42.8
1-Core 6.5
2-Core 10.9
17% 20.1 Pts
4-Core 10.9
8-Core 11.1
2% 11 Pts
64-Core 11
1% 11 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.7% Below average
Read 218
Write 93.8
Mixed 135
SusWrite 106
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 15.3
54% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 44.2
DQ Write 40.7
DQ Mixed 41.6
31% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4354324732533830304D2E4D3136464D 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.2% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback