Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211230
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '22 at 20:27
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12400-$162 17,352 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 84.4 1-Core 178 2-Core 328 106% 197 Pts	4-Core 591 8-Core 946 94% 768 Pts	64-Core 1,245 77% 1,245 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Lighting 82.7 Reflection 81.6 Parallax 77.6 67% 80.6 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 74.8 Splatting 62.2 54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82 74,184 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 712 444 457 449 453 449 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	304% Outstanding	Read 2,736 Write 1,981 Mixed 1,563 SusWrite 494 376% 1,694 MB/s	4K Read 68 4K Write 240 4K Mixed 104 363% 137 MB/s	DQ Read 1,204 DQ Write 1,140 DQ Mixed 560 588% 968 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 304% Great: 311%
Nvme WDC WDS500G2B0C-00PXH0 500GB 622 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 439GB free Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 440 442 442 440 439 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,557 Write 1,659 Mixed 1,424 SusWrite 520 290% 1,290 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 83.2 312% 125 MB/s	DQ Read 1,257 DQ Write 1,257 DQ Mixed 970 808% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 252%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M8FR 2x8GB 1,251 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 36.2 114% 39.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 29.3 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $133Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	681x
Core i5-12400Intel $162Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	248x
Core i5-12600KIntel $177Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	246x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	308x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	241x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	182x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	95x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	81x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	81x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	142x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	129x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $519

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16