Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 51.9 2-Core 77.7 46% 68.5 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 331 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1333) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 50 Parallax 6.4 3% 20.1 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.3 3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 128GB 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 39 48 53 58 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	Read 686 Write 383 Mixed 450 SusWrite 71.4 88% 398 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 29.4 98% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 112 125% 216 MB/s

Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 545GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive	Read 78.1 Write 97.2 Mixed 56 SusWrite 86.1 58% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 11.7 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10.3 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1x

SSD
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 128GBNvmeBench 86%, 891 samples	1x

RAM
99U5624-001.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBKingstonBench 65%, 3 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16