Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '22 at 08:23
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6790K APU (2013 D.Ri)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 65
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 136
54% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 220
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.3% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 114
Parallax 70.8
55% 84 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 71
Splatting 67.9
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 104 81 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 424
Write 368
Mixed 360
SusWrite 111
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 40.4
136% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 186
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
361GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 137 138 139 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 147
Write 148
Mixed 122
SusWrite 137
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
246% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFG45F-D8KM9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.2% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback