HP ProBook x360 435 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook x360 435 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8886
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 09 '22 at 22:16
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 316
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 841
89% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8886) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.10.26.06
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 26.4
16% 26.6 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 22.7
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1227 1330 1603 1826 1830 1825 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,939
Write 1,786
Mixed 1,738
SusWrite 1,607
398% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 69.4
221% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 759
511% 631 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 270%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT32G4SFD832A.C16FB 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 28
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 28.2
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook x360 435 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 435 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback