Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 1,768 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 75 1-Core 78.5 2-Core 151 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 267 35% 264 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 16 Parallax 18.8 15% 17.7 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 270 290 263 290 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 322 Write 360 Mixed 196 SusWrite 278 65% 289 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 22 89% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32.6 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 45.4 41% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 113GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 517 533 496 552 574 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1067 Write 826 Mixed 920 SusWrite 525 187% 835 MB/s	4K Read 47 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 44.7 166% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 756 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 532 402% 550 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 355%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: MN6OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 144 143 145 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 150 Write 140 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 143 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 8x16GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 32 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 90.3 44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	236x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	93x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	51x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	167x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	142x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16