PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200723 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 08 '22 at 23:17 |
Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-10400F-$124
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
67.1%
Good
|
68% 113 Pts
|
52% 417 Pts
|
46% 683 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.3%
Average
|
41% 51.8 fps
|
40% 52 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 450 448 448 435 446 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
100% 444 MB/s
|
150% 52.7 MB/s
|
138% 234 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
67.6%
Good
|
69% 24.2 GB/s
|
55% 19.4 GB/s
|
50% 79.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42% | 20% | 59 | 265 | 160 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | IVM6662 PL2740HS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $124Bench 86%, 129,229 samples | 942x |
Core i5-10400Intel $145Bench 86%, 63,113 samples | 318x |
Core i7-10700FIntel $250Bench 92%, 38,205 samples | 246x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 153%, 369,988 samples | 233x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $390Bench 89%, 574,087 samples | 210x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 373,446 samples | 199x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $705 |