Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell System XPS L702X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XN71K
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 21:45
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 150
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 370
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 0571) 3GB
Driver: Ver. 10.18.13.5362
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 8
Parallax 2.8
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 5.5
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 432 441 440 442 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 453
Write 432
Mixed 329
SusWrite 436
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 26.5
83% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 166
176% 292 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 116%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$59
596GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50% Average
Read 86.1
Write 82.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 87.8
50% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 50%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $341
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback