Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP270E5E-X01TR |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140829 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 06 '22 at 21:00 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
55.4%
Above average
|
57% 92.7 Pts
|
27% 201 Pts
|
11% 177 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 710M
Sanyo(144D C709) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
|
3.47%
Terrible
|
3% 2.47 fps
|
4% 4.53 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 359 358 333 277 198 MB/s
|
92.6%
Outstanding
|
82% 365 MB/s
|
126% 43.7 MB/s
|
226% 332 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
94GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 75 74 75 75 MB/s
|
36.3%
Below average
|
39% 52.7 MB/s
|
123% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.5%
Above average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
45% 88.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples | 85x |
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 76x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 37x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $128 |