Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 162 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 390 42% 332 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 0494) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.3 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 2.7 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 179 177 174 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 417 Write 180 Mixed 215 SusWrite 176 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 22.5 77% 27.2 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 164 144% 219 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
V01L3SF4GB26826816 2x4GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 18.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	715x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	298x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	96x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	54x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	41x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 268 samples	39x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16