Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8767
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '22 at 18:37
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$99 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 64.1 1-Core 123 2-Core 235 76% 140 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 810 75% 628 Pts	64-Core 985 61% 985 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.1% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 49.2 45% 53.3 fps	MRender 42.7 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 47 39% 47.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB 3,650 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXH Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,376 Write 2,100 Mixed 1,220 352% 1,565 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 68.2 219% 74 MB/s	DQ Read 989 DQ Write 784 DQ Mixed 899 669% 890 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 253%
Seagate Portable 2TB 11,289 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 24 29 31 30 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 18.7 Mixed 7 SusWrite 28.1 15% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 68%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 115GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 47 47 48 47 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 124 Write 57.9 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 52.2 97% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.8 146% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 1x8GB 1,124 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.3% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 8.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 52%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	1,266x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	997x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	748x

SSD
KIOXIA 512GBKbg40znv512gBench 164%, 11,361 samples	555x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 140%, 9,143 samples	361x
INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBNvmeBench 157%, 2,402 samples	306x

RAM
HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9,246 samples	436x
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 2,680 samples	280x
M378A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 71%, 9,655 samples	271x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $394

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16