Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2651 v2 80 User benchmarks, average bench 56% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 104 45% 72.8 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 428 38% 321 Pts	64-Core 833 52% 833 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD_M.2_PCI_NVME_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB 182 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0914A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 103 140 141 104 210 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 1,310 Write 903 Mixed 51.4 SusWrite 136 131% 600 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 16.8 71% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 70.2 90% 163 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 182%
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN15ABHA 256GB 1,835 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 238GB free Firmware: M6T3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 374 377 374 373 379 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 405 Write 377 Mixed 330 SusWrite 376 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 26.9 88% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 207 155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 2x8GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	48.4% Average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 18.3 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	62x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16