| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150212 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 03 '22 at 13:39 |
| Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.5%
Good
|
61% 98.9 Pts
|
44% 338 Pts
|
27% 403 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$260
CLim: 1436 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.4%
Above average
|
54% 72.6 fps
|
54% 58.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 38 123 40 126 36 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
31% 140 MB/s
|
74% 28.7 MB/s
|
73% 118 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
34GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.5 2.2 3 9.3 10 MB/s
|
14.3%
Very poor
|
16% 21.1 MB/s
|
131% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
|
72% 96.3 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
46.8%
Average
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
52% 77.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 24" | 1280 720 | ACI2493 VE247 |
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 3,052 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 67%, 356,650 samples | 1,118x |
| FX-8320AMD $244Bench 64%, 110,897 samples | 592x |
| FX-6300AMD $80Bench 61%, 271,127 samples | 563x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 870,997 samples | 166x |
| RX 580AMD $260Bench 55%, 787,457 samples | 161x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,300,415 samples | 147x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $551 |