Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211022
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 15:21
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$330
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 67.3
1-Core 213
2-Core 423
119% 234 Pts
4-Core 825
8-Core 1623
145% 1,224 Pts
64-Core 3,048
189% 3,048 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 70
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 75.6
57% 76.2 fps
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 69
62% 70.6 fps
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 974 1005 963 977 929 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,391
Write 1,018
Mixed 884
SusWrite 982
291% 1,319 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 70.2
251% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,515
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 1,089
761% 987 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 275%
Great: 363%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB
8TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 197 209 198 210 206 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 213
Write 221
Mixed 150
SusWrite 204
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 1.3
16% 5.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 7
DQ Mixed 3
3% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 26%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 437 435 430 435 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 429
Mixed 367
SusWrite 433
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 42.7
147% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 268
218% 312 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 119%
WD WD140EDGZ-11B1PA0 14TB
8TB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 98 103 107 122 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 136
Write 152
Mixed 120
SusWrite 109
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
387% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 117%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
232GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 30 30 19 25 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 70.3
Write 28.4
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 24.6
48% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.3
124% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
126% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 46.5
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 44.4
SC Mixed 23.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 126%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,097
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback