Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 234%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 12:20
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$327
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 205
2-Core 406
123% 234 Pts
4-Core 815
8-Core 1,537
140% 1,176 Pts
64-Core 2,772
172% 2,772 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306
Nvidia(10DE 1454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 5375 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 304
Reflection 228
Parallax 230
247% 254 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 218
Splatting 186
169% 210 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 197%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1313 983 982 985 971 974 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,396
Write 2,355
Mixed 2,289
SusWrite 1,035
454% 2,019 MB/s
4K Read 80.3
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 121
399% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,986
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 1627
1,162% 1,515 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 348%
Great: 410%
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
447GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 410 407 406 385 402 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 405
Mixed 343
SusWrite 402
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 37.3
150% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 185
171% 265 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Samsung MZFLW512HMJP-000MV 512GB
426GB free
Firmware: CXY74M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 634 634 635 634 634 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 637
Mixed 510
SusWrite 635
174% 785 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 50.4
221% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 537
473% 716 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 196%
Great: 151%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
252GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1791 1629 1626 1638 1637 1617 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
402% Outstanding
Read 2,541
Write 2,234
Mixed 1,959
SusWrite 1,656
471% 2,098 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 106
360% 133 MB/s
DQ Read 2,173
DQ Write 1,779
DQ Mixed 1,958
1,471% 1,970 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 402%
Great: 410%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
859GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 407 407 404 398 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 408
Write 400
Mixed 375
SusWrite 404
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 28.9
94% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 138
105% 142 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MQ01ABC150 1.5TB
452GB free
Firmware: AQ001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 32 32 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 21.3
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 33.1
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB
915GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 175 174 182 171 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 126
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 175
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95
399GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 116 143 149 151 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 131
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA2001 2TB
51GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 97 94 88 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.1% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 65
SusWrite 95.6
72% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 56%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
10GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 45 32 41 47 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 234
Write 40.9
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 41.1
87% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8
691% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 9.1
726% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3000C15 CMW32GX4M4C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 34.9
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 31.8
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 272%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-A GAMING WIFI D4 - $412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,467
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback