Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200506
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 20:34
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 191
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 434
50% 388 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.2
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 8.8
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 157 162 170 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,257
Write 65.1
Mixed 213
SusWrite 152
90% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 24.2
119% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 98
DQ Mixed 72.5
121% 249 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 110%
Great: 234%
Micron Crucial X6 SSD 500GB
240GB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 72 72 75 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 414
Write 534
Mixed 472
SusWrite 86.3
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 27.5
89% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 108
81% 108 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback