Asus P5Q

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5Q (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '21 at 20:00
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5450-$195 10,801 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 53.4 2-Core 104 49% 77.7 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 216 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Lighting 63.3 Reflection 60 Parallax 83.2 52% 68.8 fps	MRender 60.9 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 44.6 45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB 26,886 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 102 21 50 0.6 40 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.2% Above average	Read 253 Write 136 Mixed 213 SusWrite 71.1 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 31.8 117% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 32.1 DQ Mixed 31.1 43% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 94%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 42GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 85 85 83 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 93.9 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 84.4 62% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 60%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 23GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 97 99 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 95.2 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 99.3 65% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.97 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	75x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	56x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	38x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	23x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	194x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	90x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16