Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X570-PRO (all builds)
Memory	47.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210809
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '21 at 16:50
Run Duration	364 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 68.1 1-Core 130 2-Core 240 79% 146 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 820 79% 650 Pts	64-Core 1,233 76% 1,233 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13025.5005 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.9% Average	Lighting 51.3 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 74.9 42% 61.3 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 56.8 Splatting 42.7 42% 52.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 554GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1325 1205 1221 1180 1244 948 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	198% Outstanding	Read 2,130 Write 576 Mixed 855 SusWrite 1187 262% 1,187 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 11.2 4K Mixed 12 94% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 589 DQ Write 35.4 DQ Mixed 209 178% 278 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 198% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 147GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 283 285 282 272 268 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 453 Write 272 Mixed 304 SusWrite 293 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 12.2 66% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 34GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,096 Write 1,432 Mixed 1,457 368% 1,662 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 57 183% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 730 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 330 279% 421 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 413GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 42 45 46 45 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 27GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 27 28 29 33 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65% Good	Read 457 Write 400 Mixed 347 SusWrite 69.8 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 33.1 110% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 153 123% 172 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 141 142 139 143 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 151 Write 152 Mixed 45 SusWrite 140 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 107%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 24 26 26 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 203 Write 32.3 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 25.2 85% 83 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 5.8 390% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4WL.M16FE BL16G36C164WL.M8FB1 BL16G36C16U4WL.M16FE BL16G36C16U4WL.M8FB1 64GB 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	68.9% Good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 28.3 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 23.9 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	894x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	817x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	775x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	605x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	409x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	351x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	369x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	298x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	207x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	188x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	170x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	152x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,254

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16