Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac (all builds)
Memory	20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '21 at 22:27
Run Duration	338 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 78.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 223 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 822 76% 632 Pts	64-Core 1,115 69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B 49,289 User benchmarks, average bench 20% ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.15.01 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 32.5 19% 27.7 fps	MRender 27.2 Gravity 25.3 Splatting 20 19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 483GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1409 996 954 879 832 941 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	244% Outstanding	Read 2,008 Write 2,239 Mixed 1,829 SusWrite 1,002 398% 1,770 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 66.9 226% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 904 DQ Write 539 DQ Mixed 752 552% 732 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 244% Great: 347%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 410GB free Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 709 710 710 711 710 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 717 Write 704 Mixed 700 SusWrite 709 160% 708 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 60.7 205% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 777 DQ Write 715 DQ Mixed 850 609% 781 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 284%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$108 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 127 127 126 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 96.8 Write 101 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 122 71% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.5 208% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 90%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$71 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 215GB free Firmware: MKAOAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 80.9 Write 81.6 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 84.6 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 87%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 833GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 113 112 112 112 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 112 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 82%
Hua722020ala330 45W6276 59Y1813IBM 2TB 855 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 524GB free Firmware: JKAOA3HH SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 89 90 92 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 78.5 Write 83.3 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 88.7 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 71%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 133GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 60 61 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 55.2 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 60.2 39% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB 368 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 27.9 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 28 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Master SLI/ac Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac - $150

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	158x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	48x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	34x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	26x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	22x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	17x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $674

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Master SLI/ac - $150

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)