Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06FW8P
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 23:52
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 170
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 565
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 1,296
80% 1,296 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 86C7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 173
Parallax 176
140% 174 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 152
Splatting 130
126% 157 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 78 81 78 80 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 241
Write 219
Mixed 215
SusWrite 81.9
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 27.1
86% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 195
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 121%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
331GB free
Firmware: 0C09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 87.8
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 89.3
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 62%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: 0C09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 64 64 65 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 66.9
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 64.1
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 62%
WD WD50PURX-64LZMY0 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 135 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
76% Very good
Read 130
Write 135
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 136
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback