Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UAR
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 09:25
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 184
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 290
40% 294 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 65%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1311) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.2
7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1116 773 768 773 777 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 1743
Mixed 962
SusWrite 913
286% 1,273 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 98
325% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 955
DQ Write 661
DQ Mixed 734
568% 783 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 252%
Great: 346%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 129 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 121
Write 122
Mixed 53.3
SusWrite 128
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR 859B CT8G4SFRA266.M8FR 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.3% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 23.5
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback