PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ |
Memory | 23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150304 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Dec 21 '21 at 16:12 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 318 322 321 322 321 MB/s
|
83.8%
Excellent
|
|||
WD My Passport 260D 4TB
291GB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GB
2 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 5x |
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 7x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,238Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 4x |
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples | 3x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 7x |
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $149Bench 336%, 200,600 samples | 3x |
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $214Bench 290%, 10,709 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $184 |