Asrock H310CM-DVS

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-DVS (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1768 x 992 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '21 at 00:12
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 88 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 736 76% 614 Pts	64-Core 725 45% 725 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.4% Poor	Lighting 37 Reflection 42 Parallax 42.9 30% 40.6 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 27.8 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB 3,094 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPC0014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 365 145 142 144 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 426 Mixed 371 SusWrite 224 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 40.2 152% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 280 210% 277 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 10GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 476 Write 445 Mixed 376 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 63.8 216% 76.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 352 265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 680GB free Firmware: 05.01A05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 113 110 112 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 111 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.8 200% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 22 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 31.1 SC Mixed 24.1 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-DVS Builds (Compare 2,397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-DVS

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	668x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	448x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	197x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	176x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	132x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	141x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	124x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	52x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	44x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16