Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '21 at 11:23
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 146
59% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 384
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 387
26% 387 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 34.3
21% 29.8 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 28.4
Splatting 20
23% 25.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 23%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$199
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 90 126 134 134 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 290
Write 243
Mixed 130
SusWrite 118
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 22.7
95% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 24.9
27% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50%
Great: 84%
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB
747GB free
Firmware: STWSN010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 293 293 288 291 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 287
Write 249
Mixed 232
SusWrite 280
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 36.1
31% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$69
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 127 135 134 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 123
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 0" 1280 701 SAMSUNG
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 2,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $677
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback