PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150805 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 20 '21 at 11:23 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
60.6%
Good
|
59% 97.3 Pts
|
42% 323 Pts
|
26% 387 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
|
22.1%
Poor
|
21% 29.8 fps
|
23% 25.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 840 250GB-$199
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 90 126 134 134 127 MB/s
|
50%
Above average
|
44% 195 MB/s
|
95% 34.4 MB/s
|
27% 43.3 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA960CV10001 960GB
747GB free
Firmware: STWSN010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 293 293 288 291 293 MB/s
|
64.7%
Good
|
59% 262 MB/s
|
109% 37.7 MB/s
|
31% 44.6 MB/s
|
![]() WD Green 2TB (2012)-$69
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 127 135 134 130 MB/s
|
68.3%
Good
|
77% 104 MB/s
|
191% 1.4 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.1%
Below average
|
32% 11.2 GB/s
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
42% 94.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 0" | 1280 701 | SAMSUNG |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 67%, 330,237 samples | 809x |
FX-6300AMD $80Bench 61%, 271,127 samples | 498x |
FX-8320AMD $244Bench 64%, 110,897 samples | 298x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $340Bench 51%, 832,260 samples | 152x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,300,415 samples | 149x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 870,997 samples | 127x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $677 |