PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 7010 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 7010 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180628 |
Uptime | 3.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '21 at 19:14 |
Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M2CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 218 268 444 275 243 MB/s
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62
128GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 436 445 451 439 315 MB/s
|
94%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 195 198 201 199 204 MB/s
|
94.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5673GB0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5673GB0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 3,919x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 3,540x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 1,609x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 2,189x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 984x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 933x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |