Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '21 at 08:27
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 734
76% 610 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 222
Parallax 373
152% 260 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 146
Splatting 239
168% 201 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 146%
Great: 178%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 8.6
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 11.7
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CQ20902 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 406 469 419 379 606 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,651
Write 1,925
Mixed 1,378
SusWrite 625
313% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 65
216% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,319
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 818
651% 927 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 215%
Great: 234%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
856GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 829 833 832 830 832 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1,684
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 937
297% 1,318 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 68.1
232% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,148
875% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 239%
Great: 276%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 24.1
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback