Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 124 60% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 319 34% 272 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 45.6 Reflection 42.5 Parallax 40.7 37% 42.9 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 44 Splatting 28.9 30% 37 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 27 43 33 2.7 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.4% Poor	Read 121 Write 112 Mixed 84.6 SusWrite 38.3 20% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 14.8 49% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.3 DQ Write 20.1 DQ Mixed 3.6 7% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 44GB 6,316 User benchmarks, average bench 23% null MHz 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $300

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16