Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 14:32
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4440-$248
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 89
2-Core 176
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 332
45% 330 Pts
64-Core 285
19% 285 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Lighting 40.3
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 40.6
33% 41.2 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 28.7
33% 36.3 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 451
Write 436
Mixed 406
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.3
187% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 361
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
596GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 106
Write 98.9
Mixed 38.3
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 106%
Flash Disk 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 20.6
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.2
10% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
14% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 11%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
915GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 117 118 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 120
Write 107
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 117
137% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 107 6 60 72.3" 1920 1080 ___0101 LCDTV16
Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 11,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $244
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $350Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback