MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results


Gaming 142% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C35
Motherboard	MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210926
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '21 at 11:46
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$201 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 79 1-Core 184 2-Core 362 109% 208 Pts	4-Core 708 8-Core 327 78% 518 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Gigabyte(1458 404C) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 226 Reflection 205 Parallax 198 184% 210 fps	MRender 198 Gravity 148 Splatting 131 127% 159 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 424GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4150 SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 213 198 217 208 208 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	75.6% Very good	Read 478 Write 268 Mixed 241 SusWrite 211 66% 299 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 29.9 123% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 97.3 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 117 97% 135 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 112%
Samsung 980 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 540GB free Firmware: 3B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 3570 3581 3580 1885 1441 1443 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 70%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$93 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 877GB free Firmware: RR09 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 165 158 173 165 166 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 148 Write 221 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 166 111% 153 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 408% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 4,119 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.5% Good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 25.8 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 26 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	451x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	440x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	340x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	239x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,280Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	213x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	207x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	166x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	154x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	105x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	97x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	70x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16