HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150407
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 01:55
Run Duration540 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 182
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 440
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.25
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.1
6% 10.1 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 10.4
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 387 433 401 423 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 422
Mixed 317
SusWrite 407
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 30.5
105% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 141
161% 278 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 116%
ACSC4M512mSA 507GB
289GB free
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 232 234 229 233 231 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 248
Write 228
Mixed 208
SusWrite 230
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 25.2
82% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 154
123% 172 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 97%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
317GB free
Firmware: JF3OA0E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 94 95 97 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 64.2
Write 58.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 95.4
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
446GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.4 7.6 8.3 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 37.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 9.4
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
4GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 6.9 6.9 6.4 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 17.9
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 6.6
25% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.7
166% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 31%
Generic USB Flash Disk 8GB
3GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3 2.9 3 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Read 25
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 2.8
10% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 13%
LG X TICK 4GB
4GB free, PID 70d4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.31% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 1
6% 6.32 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.31%
Great: 7%
Samsung S2 Portable 3 1TB
754GB free, PID 60a6
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.65 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 39%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
239GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 18 17 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 29.4
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 16.1
36% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback