Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5250-$90 962 User benchmarks, average bench 31% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 61.6 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 38 29% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 38.3 8-Core 38.1 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 38.3 2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 20B5) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.34% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 1 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.8 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.8 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.34% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 122 112 81 82 82 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37% Below average	Read 130 Write 121 Mixed 124 SusWrite 95 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 33.1 4K Mixed 19.6 70% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 98.4 DQ Mixed 99.7 75% 100 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo T5250Intel $90Bench 31%, 962 samples	2x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16