Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 45.6 1-Core 51.4 2-Core 101 38% 65.9 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 183 19% 152 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.1 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8510B 128GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80010C00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 458 Write 334 Mixed 464 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 27.8 80% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 254 192% 259 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x4GB 3,234 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.4% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 8.9 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	2x

SSD
HFM128GDHTNG-8510B 128GBBench 96%, 227 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 3,234 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16