Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 3,527 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 62 2-Core 125 59% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 313 34% 270 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 34E7) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Lighting 9.7 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 3.6 8% 8.37 fps	MRender 8.4 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 5.3 6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair CSSD-F160GBP2 180GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 66 69 70 69 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	30% Below average	Read 104 Write 103 Mixed 110 SusWrite 67.9 22% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 13.7 65% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 27 DQ Write 82.2 DQ Mixed 29.7 30% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	35.3% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
CSSD-F160GBP2 180GBCorsairBench 34%, 41 samples	4x
GP-ASACNE2100TTTDR 1TBGigabyteBench 218%, 1,426 samples	3x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $249

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16