PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5P43TD (all builds) |
Memory | 6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100622 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 07 '21 at 18:33 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | CYP-User |
Background CPU | 67% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
45.9%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8569) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 51 40 51 52 53 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3750330AS 750GB-$137
44GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 58 44 59 58 58 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 19x |
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $290 |