Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 95 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 536 52% 429 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.31 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 42 Parallax 37.1 32% 39.4 fps	MRender 50.5 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 39.1 34% 42 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,132 Write 409 Mixed 509 149% 683 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 49.6 191% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 632 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 319 256% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF M393A1G40DB0-CPB 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86% Excellent	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 39.1 MC Mixed 30.2 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 95%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16