Vizio CA27

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Vizio CA27 (all builds)
Motherboard	Quanta XV1
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120521
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '21 at 03:52
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 145 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 335 36% 289 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M 3,728 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Quanta(152D 0924) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	4.36% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 6.4 4% 5.8 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 5.6 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.36% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OSC mSATA 256GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 203 209 208 211 211 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.1% Average	Read 252 Write 209 Mixed 167 SusWrite 207 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 10.1 56% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 63.7 74% 127 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 68%
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 119GB free Firmware: VA001C81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 227 227 224 228 228 MB/s Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.8% Above average	Read 247 Write 226 Mixed 216 SusWrite 226 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 25.3 86% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 196 144% 189 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.8% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CA27 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Vizio CA27

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	7x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	2x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	8x
GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples	1x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

SSD
240GB 240GBNetacBench 66%, 2,483 samples	5x
PM871a 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 95%, 636 samples	2x
Premier SP550 480GBAdata $129Bench 82%, 8,505 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x
AD73I1C1674EV 2x4GBAdataBench 43%, 1,403 samples	3x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GBMicronBench 52%, 112 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16