To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 85.8 2-Core 171 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 572 55% 452 Pts	64-Core 870 54% 870 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1564 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Lighting 87.9 Reflection 93.6 Parallax 83 72% 88.2 fps	MRender 87.8 Gravity 80.9 Splatting 73.1 65% 80.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme PCIe SSD 256GB 566 User benchmarks, average bench 155% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 279 253 231 209 186 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 794 Write 453 Mixed 280 SusWrite 246 98% 443 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 28.2 96% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 468 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 149 158% 269 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 208%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 126GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 222 222 227 231 231 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.1% Good	Read 256 Write 243 Mixed 220 SusWrite 230 54% 237 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 28.6 92% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 196 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 34.9 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 12.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	710x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	263x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	615x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	102x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16