Lenovo 20175

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20175 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO INVALID
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20121019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	45%
CPU Throttled	79%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3517U 8,454 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 90.7 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 122 60% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 176 23% 173 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 2.8 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.8 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MT-256 256GB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 122GB free Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 229 230 227 231 229 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.8% Average	Read 251 Write 232 Mixed 222 SusWrite 228 53% 234 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 16.5 72% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 13.3 DQ Write 30.8 DQ Mixed 26.6 19% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 99%
Samsung MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM13L1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 225 228 225 229 229 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.7% Average	Read 248 Write 226 Mixed 180 SusWrite 225 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 17.8 61% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 12.3 DQ Write 84.4 DQ Mixed 15.7 22% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6D1 1x8GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20175 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20175

CPU
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	27x
Core i7-3537UIntelBench 52%, 17,065 samples	24x
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	20x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	83x

SSD
MZMPC128HBFU-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 1,498 samples	22x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	21x
MZMTD256HAGM-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 987 samples	16x

RAM
SHARETRONIC 1x4GBUnknownBench 27%, 954 samples	20x
M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,750 samples	12x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6D1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 162 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16