PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte B250M-Gaming 3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B250M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180410 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 05 '21 at 20:09 |
Run Duration | 272 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B E208) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maxsun 240GB NM6C-2280 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0802C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 202 91 323 130 385 MB/s
|
158%
Outstanding
|
|||
Maxtor 6G160E0 160GB
30GB free
Firmware: KA101V00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 43 43 44 44 MB/s
|
23.7%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
235GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 113 111 112 114 113 MB/s
|
53.3%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
119GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 73 73 73 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
78%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
37% | 11% | 131 | 104 | 7 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | AOC2243 2243W |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 209x |
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 191x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 148x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 200x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 101x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 77x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $284 |