Asrock H570M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H570M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210413
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 75%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 30.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 264
75% 150 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 880
85% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,179
73% 1,179 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Zotac(19DA 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72% Very good
Lighting 89.7
Reflection 82.2
Parallax 98.9
73% 90.3 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 82.9
Splatting 68.9
70% 88.3 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 72%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDBRPG5000ANC-WRSN 500GB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 689 607 571 555 573 620 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,557
Write 1,635
Mixed 1,346
SusWrite 602
288% 1,285 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 57.7
204% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,282
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 1,101
828% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 212%
Great: 296%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 115 115 115 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 65
Write 98.1
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 113
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
151% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 64%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 94 93 94 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 85.6
Mixed 57
SusWrite 92.4
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 55%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 105 100 101 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 91.5
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 100
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
442GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 74 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 51.8
Write 48.4
Mixed 35
SusWrite 71.2
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 51%
WD My Passport 259D 4TB
2TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 92 92 92 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 97.9
Write 86.1
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 91.2
112% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 9.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H570M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $493
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback