Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3920XM 797 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 193 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 476 50% 403 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M 2,310 User benchmarks, average bench 8% HP(103C 176C) 2GB CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.00 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	7.76% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 11.3 Parallax 11.3 7% 10.4 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 11.2 Splatting 10.4 9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.76% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
D2CSTK251M21-0480 480GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 128 124 126 110 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 290 Write 182 Mixed 276 SusWrite 128 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 15.6 4K Mixed 17.5 55% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 79.1 DQ Mixed 88.3 82% 132 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB M471B5273DH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 18.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	296x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	95x
Radeon HD 7700MAMDBench 7%, 733 samples	25x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	34x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	14x
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	13x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	20x
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x8GBElpidaBench 51%, 682 samples	11x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 53%, 361 samples	11x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16