| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 23.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191107 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '21 at 17:48 |
| Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 46% |
PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71%
Very good
|
70% 125 Pts
|
56% 419 Pts
|
27% 439 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23.7%
Poor
|
24% 33.2 fps
|
23% 28 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 53 45 71 75 70 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
56% 75.8 MB/s
|
149% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
160GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 77 75 76 76 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
67% 91 MB/s
|
142% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CB8GU2400.C8ET 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
46.3%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 2,985 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 436x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 322x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 300x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 221x |
| Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 199x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 164x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $298 |