PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180419 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 05 '21 at 16:49 |
Run Duration | 268 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 76% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 82 48 54 50 50 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Crucial MX500 500GB-$49
187GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 291 363 384 374 373 MB/s
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
71GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 47 56 55 60 62 MB/s
|
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,451x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,298x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,002x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 942x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 730x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 649x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 104% - Outstanding | Total price: $316 |