Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory33.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 10:27
Run Duration775 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 234
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 772
74% 611 Pts
64-Core 1,226
76% 1,226 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 108
Parallax 98.1
79% 101 fps
MRender 90.4
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 97.5
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1496 983 282 210 311 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,635
Write 1,823
Mixed 1,656
SusWrite 580
320% 1,424 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 68.4
222% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 620
467% 627 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 198%
Great: 365%
WDC WD4003FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
15GB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 169 164 170 165 169 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 163
Write 165
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 166
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.2
9% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 4.9
DQ Mixed 4.1
3% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 27%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
44GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 486
Write 461
Mixed 380
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 50.8
168% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 349
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 79 86 89 83 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 99.2
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 85.7
56% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52%
Great: 88%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
56GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 92 115 122 121 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 100
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 100%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
196GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 87 88 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 84.7
Write 83.9
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 86.5
50% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 92%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
199GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9 11 12 14 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
337GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 112 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61% Good
Read 101
Write 113
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 111
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61%
Great: 92%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
31GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 91.1
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 92.2
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 88%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 3TB
110GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 139
Write 145
Mixed 71.1
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 104%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
232GB free
Firmware: 0203
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.4
Write 73.7
Mixed 24.6
44% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 40.9
130% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 20.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback