| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H370M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20191205 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '21 at 03:16 |
| Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
88.1%
Excellent
|
85% 152 Pts
|
70% 550 Pts
|
42% 677 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
|
73.6%
Very good
|
75% 102 fps
|
71% 89.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 12 6.8 149 59 56 MB/s
|
151%
Outstanding
|
173% 781 MB/s
|
215% 73.7 MB/s
|
268% 455 MB/s
|
|
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 165 163 165 168 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
35% 154 MB/s
|
8% 3.77 MB/s
|
2% 4.23 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.8%
Very good
|
79% 27.6 GB/s
|
67% 23.3 GB/s
|
60% 66.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 406 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H370M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 72x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 64x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 55x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 37x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 29x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 26x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 106% - Outstanding | Total price: $190 |